Should We See the Decline of the Cult of Attacking Play, Let’s Enjoy Its Legacy.
The Life Cycle of a Movement can be marked by distinct phases.
1. The Core Concept
A charismatic leader or figureheads propose a revolutionary approach offering a cure for struggling players.
And so it goes. They’re getting ready to storm the compound overseas. Tensions are rising. Conflict emerges from the sidelines. One individual, exposed, anxious, the phrase ATTACKING MINDSET displayed prominently as a statement, has emerged from the field and is removed in secrecy to a different team in county cricket.
Do you recall the beginning, when the world was still young? The days of Bazball 1.0, of pure instinct.
2. Love-Bombing
Cult leaders guarantee a reboot, hope for a future, camaraderie, success within a community with shared faith in the philosophy.
What was this thing initially? A team united enjoying success. Tattoos. Forearms. Focus. Confident masculinity. Of course, The team often say they don’t use the label, amusingly because if it doesn’t exist, what was that spectacle?
Yet it’s clear its essence. It’s the batsman attempting a move so depraved it defies description. It’s the thrill of the captain at his peak, a look that says: focused titan, beard made of wood, untamed style, truly contemporary you half-expect to notice and find him positioned on the ground shirtless embracing nature.
It’s the opener still being allowed speaking publicly, resembling a happy little woodland creature smartly dressed, expressing thoughts like we’re breaking down traditions. And yes, the energy, initially, was uplifting.
3. Expansion Period
Growth phase. Togetherness strengthened via memorization of mantras. These beliefs are often illogical as a test of “true belief”.
Am I alone? The reaction, the anger, the sense of betrayal post-defeat feels overblown, unwarranted. The batting collapsed in Perth, as they often do in Australia. They were savaged in the field for a couple of hours when tactics failed, carved around by the opponent playing aggressively but smarter, responsive to the situation, an athlete shining with a kind of light around him.
Now there is the attacks, the anger, the sense of English Test cricket as a failure. The feeling seems to be that England don’t just need to lose, they need to lose righteously, to be purged, obliterated, overwhelmed via traditional methods of Mitchell Starc’s movements, the conventional tactics of the bowler, marking his wickets modestly similar to getting a rewarding prize. How will they respond?
4. The Backlash Phase
Problems arise due to setbacks. Yet, mistakes are denied. It starts to feed on anger towards critics.
In truth, half a week out the next match, we’ve entered an intriguing moment in the lifespan of this thing. Victory is possible in Brisbane in a blur of adrenal disruption. Probably, failure may follow. In case of defeat it appears we could be witnessing the final stage.
Before that happens, there are two things worth saying regarding this. More than two years ago, back in those heady early days, of light and heat, I wrote an article labeling it a movement. There was outrage, which was helpful because everyone knows a method to show lack of cult status is if supporters respond with anger denying scrutiny of the philosophy.
What has happened in the last few days are equally notable. It seems that hating Bazball has now become the cult. We have a uniformly angry internet, critical analysts, images of frustrated travelling fans cheated out of three days of cricket, like a room full of investors demanding recourse.
Meanwhile, there is the broader context of the host’s complex more culturally hard-wired exasperation towards the unconventional visitors, out there saying, hey, that thing you love and have honed as part of your identity culturally from us, it’s just a joke after all.
This is the core issue. Everything is a cult. The style was a trend since the sport itself is insular. Or at least, English cricket has always been a cult, a clique, an elite gathering, a closed world with centuries of ceremonial past supporting it. Historically, this was where influence is guarded. It’s the British pastime of England, the pioneering brand. And notably, Britain is itself a cult, a series of esoteric hierarchies, a royal family remains.
The players have been enclosed within this world since childhood. Attempting to break free, to foster positivity, they are simply replicating their own experience, forming a new circle, a closed circle, however with a modern squad and a mentor who wants you to be yourself as long as yourself is quite a lot like myself.
Live where your feet are. Confront risks. However much you change, you remain stuck.
With this mind, now is the time to offer compassion for the approach, to appreciate its good points, which are significant. How to define it? Promoting liberation. Questioning traditions. Batting aggressively|Attacking with