Relatives' Anguish Regarding Shoreline Degradation Threatening Norfolk Burial Sites
Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.
A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards
Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.
A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer sites. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.
“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”
Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.
Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles
One resident recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.
“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”
“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”
A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy
Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.
“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”
In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”
Searching for Answers and Certainty
The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.
Several families are calling for more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is drawing near.
“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”
A local official confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”
It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”
“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each community.”
The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.